🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he was able to withstand defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has proved himself to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Over Formation & Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Supreme Power In the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to go into a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to determine the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for playing excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and then bin him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.